Evolution: A theory with a tiny, tiny room for error
By E. I. Sanchez on Dec 1, 2009 | 285 views | 6 feedbacks »Over the Thanksgiving holiday last week, my family and I drove from Chicago to New York City. While there, we visited the American Museum of Natural History (which you might remember from such films as "Night at the Museum") and it seemed to me that evolution was being taught as fact through out the exhibits. No complaints there.
All was well when suddenly --- we entered one particular section where I got the impression the museum wing donor or sponsor might have been a creationist.
I say this because - there were several disclaimers posted on the glass cases. I took pictures of two. One relating to Duckbill life-styles said:
we are overstating the strength of the fossil evidence if we present these ideas as truth...
|
Then last night, while putting my daughter (6 years old) to bed, we started talking about how birds came from dinosaurs. I don't know how this came up but I mentioned Charles Darwin.
She asked: Who is he?
I said: He was a scientist that believed that humans came from monkeys.
And we started laughing like only kids can...
For the record, I did tell her (after we stopped laughing) that we didn't come from monkeys but even after telling her that we evolved from a common ancestor and our closest relative being chimps - we still giggled a bit more...
This reminded me of an episode of Friends in which Phoebe takes Ross to school.
6 comments
The San Diego Zoo and other museums here assume neo-Darwinism is true as a matter of course as well.
Kids know this sounds weird...
Have you explained Quantum Theory? (Notice the word THEORY in there too). Atoms, the parts of things. Parts so small that we can’t see them, but we know they are there because we can record they're effects. When we break them down even further into, the parts of the parts of things, we get protons, electrons and neutrons. And we don’t have to stop there, the parts of the parts of the parts of things leptons, hadrons, bosons, (The Higgs Boson being the infamous God Particle), Quarks, which come in different "flavours", such as up, down, top, bottom, charm and strange... I bet she'd laugh at all that that too.
Although of course there's no "Teach the Controversy" movement with any of this, but then it doesn't make the first book of the bible look like the ignorant scribblings of nomadic tribe of goat herders. They could know everything about Quantum Theory and could still read Genesis without thinking, "Well if the start is all so wrong, how bad must the rest of it be"?
My daughter had a similar laughing experience at school during Religious Education. The teacher was going over different religions and their core values and beliefs and my daughter let out a small giggle. When the teacher asked what she was laughing at she replied, "How can they ALL be true"?
The teacher took this as an excuse to try and put forward the merits of her own beliefs and my daughter said, "But if you were in India now, you'd be saying that about Hinduism"... She got a detention for not showing "respect".
It seems respecting beliefs doesn't extend to respecting a lack of them.
That's pretty sharp that she would speak her mind up like that. and I would agree with her that - How can they All be true? Of course they can't.
This is why Pluralism is good from a tolerance perspective but not from a 'Truth' perspective. We must have check and balances and question.
This is something that Coyne talked about on that vide you shared. We want to teach our kids to think logically and we want to create an environment where they can safely ask questions and challenge each other. -- Especially teachers that sometimes have an authority blanket and just make remarks.
This of course can get dangerous as kids can be mean and pick on and beat each other but assume there's no violence - let them work it out through speech or debate classes.
I never heard of debate classes at my school What a shame!
Then he got "lucky" again when saying multiple times that the number of stars was akin to the number of grains of sand in the sea. After all, the ancients thought there were only ~1,100 starts.
How did this hillbilly get so lucky?
Leave a comment
Recent comments
- Siddha Medicine on Don't Hate me: But I just contributed to the Atheists fund - Again
- online up on Netflix: Top 10 Worldview Movies
- 10top on Netflix: Top 10 Worldview Movies
- E. I. Sanchez on Five Minutes with Richard Dawkins
- Willem Kooijman on Five Minutes with Richard Dawkins
- Dan on In response to: A Defense of #Abortion by Judith Jarvis Thomson
Rollblog
- Defending The Faith
- The Alert's BlogRoll





