The Trinity is like an egg... and like number three
By E. I. Sanchez on Jul 14, 2009 | 1090 views | 8 feedbacks »
|
Earlier this Spring, I was teaching a couple of lessons in Apologetics and -- during one of these -- we discussed the Trinity. The challenge I gave to a small group was to think of ways to engage people in a conversation and describe the Trinity. |
| Photo Courtesy of news.bbc.co.uk | |
One of the ideas they presented was the Egg. There's the shell. the yolk. the egg white. 3 different components. One Egg.
I like the illusion ergo illustration. If it has a flaw, I would say that it's bad cholesterol (I know -- I need to keep my day job).
Seriously though. Even if Google lists lots of problems with this analogy, what illustration is going to get it right anyway?
On a side note, the other day my daughter quizzed me and asked:
Daddy, What's 1 + 1 + 1?
I said: Three Silly!
She smiled and said: No It's God. God the Father, the Son and Holy Spirit. {She learned this at Sunday School}
This got me wondering: Wouldn't be best if we didn't explain the Trinity to kids and let them figure it out all by themselves? We should simply tell them.
The Lord your God is One. And In the Beginning was The Word. And the Word was God. And He became flesh. And His Spirit is with us.
Let kids' imaginations do the math.
8 comments
This is not a bad thing, because as an out-worldly being, God might be outside of logic as he is time, as the creator of both.
Some people, esp. theologians of the east, tended to state such actual mysteries (not the "my Calvinism leads me into trouble, so I'll call it a mystery) in negative terms instead of positive ones. Rather than trying to explain the trinity out into the last detail, apophatic theology states what the trinity is not. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_theology#In_the_Christian_tradition)
When it comes to the trinity, I say we either limit out boldness to apophatic theology, or accept (and give grace to) flawed models of the trinity.
I think they can be tremendously helpful, as long as both parties understand that it is only accurate in part.
For Kids, I would prefer to let them think through it and come up with their own illustration.
Stating what the trinity is not is probably the best compromised.
I no longer buy books that tell me about God's nature. I think the Bible is the only one book you really need to know read about his Nature.
Of course, this illustration melts under the heat as well.. but it's worth the thought. :)
Blessings
Nicely put. I like it! Thanks for sharing...
Leave a comment
Recent comments
- Dan on Attention all Calvinists: What Bible Study do you use?
- Timothy on Ravi Zacharias explains in 'Has Christianity Failed You?'
- E. I. Sanchez on Ravi Zacharias explains in 'Has Christianity Failed You?'
- Dan on Ravi Zacharias explains in 'Has Christianity Failed You?'
- Hank Imler on Does God love everybody equally?
- Hank Imler on Does God love everybody equally?
Rollblog
- Defending The Faith
- The Alert's BlogRoll






