- Featured Blog: 4Simpsons.com
- California Schemin’
- EXPELLED II - The Tables are Turned
- Weekly roundup
- Woo-hoo!
- Bishop follows his heart, not the Bible
Edgar is reading:
To check my progress, click here
Recent Comments
- Havok on Loving Christ: More than feelings
- Dan on Commentary on California Same-Sex Marriage Decision
- Dan on Obama's View on Homosexuality
- Neil on Obama's View on Homosexuality
- E. I. Sanchez on The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian
- E. I. Sanchez on Obama's View on Homosexuality

The precedent isn’t that one man can also marry one man, or that one woman can also marry one woman. Rather .... The judges redefined marriage to mean that it can be anything we want it to be, including polygamy, incest and bestiality. They didn’t spell that out, but it is the logical consequence of the “decision.”


