The Gospel of Philip
By E. I. Sanchez on Dec 4, 2006 | 2929 views | 9 feedbacks »What is it? The Gospel of Philip
How was it discovered? In the Nag Hammadi library in Egypt in 1945
Who wrote it? We don't know. Neither the Apostle Philip nor Philip the Deacon mentioned in the New Testament. Both would have been dead by the time this story was written.
Furthermore, the gospel of Philip does not claim to have been written by Jesus' disciple Philip. It is titled "The Gospel According to Philip" due to Philip being the only disciple of Jesus who is named in the story (gotquestions.org).
When do liberals claim it was written? 180-250 AD.
When was it really written? Biblical scholar Ben Witherington III dates it to the third century.
So what's the problem?
- It's not a gospel. Like the Gospel of Thomas, it doesn't tell the story Jesus' birth, life, death, and resurrection. At best, it is a Gnostic Sermon.
- Late date. It is dated too late to take seriously as a first-hand account.
- It lacks apostolic authorship and early church usage. There is no evidence that any Church Father validated this document as a true Gospel. On the other hand, all the books of the New Testament have demonstrated apostolic authorship.
- It denies creation by God and calls it a mistake (Newman). "The world came about through a mistake. For he who created it wanted to create it imperishable and immortal. He fell short of attaining his desire. For the world never was imperishable, nor, for that matter, was he who made the world (Gospel of Philip)."
- It denies the Virgin Birth (Newman). "Some said, 'Mary conceived by the Holy Spirit.' They are in error. They do not know what they are saying. When did a woman ever conceive by a woman? Mary is the virgin whom no power defiled. She is a great anathema to the Hebrews, who are the apostles and the apostolic men.… And the Lord would not have said 'My Father who is in heaven' unless he had had another father, but he would have said simply 'my father.' (Gospel of Philip)."
It is grossly heretical at times. "God is a man-eater. For this reason, men are sacrificed to him. Before men were sacrificed, animals were being sacrificed, since those to whom they were sacrificed were not gods (Gospel of Philip)."
"The eucharist is Jesus. For he is called in Syriac, 'Pharisatha,' which is 'the one who is spread out', for Jesus came to crucify the world (Gospel of Philip)."
In Summary, the Gospel of Philip is full of Gnosticism and heretical views on creation, Jesus, the Trinity, and the Virgin Birth. We cannot trust this document to provide reliable information about the life of Jesus of Nazareth.
Related: Gospel of Mary | Gospel of Thomas | Gospel of Philip | Gospel of Judas | Gospel of Barnabas
Resources:
- Dating: http://www.naminggrace.org/id65.htm
- Gospel of Philip. http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/gop.html
- Newman, Robert C.: http://www.ibri.org/Ppt-DaVinciCode
- Witherington, Ben III: http://www.benwitherington.com/
9 comments
If you look at the original meanings of the words you quote such as 'sacrifice' meaning raised up or ascended, you will see a different meaning. 'God is nurished by man, and vise versa. Men are raised up to Him. Before men were raised up to him, animals were raised up to Him.' Each of us must come to overcome the fragmented animal natures within our minds to make ourselves as a pure lamb and live as Yeshua showed us so as to manifest the Source within us and raise up what is sinful into that which is pure. Yeshua told the man who asked about everlasting life to fulfill the Law and then give away all he had to follow Him. This is a journey all of us need to take.
Perhaps your judgment against this writing is due to you incomplete understanding of the good news it is portraying mixed with some confusion from the interpolations that were added to the Bible by the Roman Government's church. (http://thelie.org)
Thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment.
I have to comments for follow up:
If the “The truth is within us all,” how did we go wrong and away from it? Not only that, if Truth cannot be accepted by the carnal mind, what is the standard by which to test allegorical subjectivity? In other words, how do we know we got it right? Is it because it is Gnostic?
I am also interested in knowing what happens to people that do not hold the Gnostic worldview. Is there punishment after death? (e.g. eternal Hell) Do people get a second chance to see the Light? Or does everybody go into the Light (e.g. Heaven)? A link to an article you can recommend would be highly appreciated…
Greetings. We all have as many chances as it takes to live the truth. We know the truth is within us. Be a simple man. God is the simple truth. Love be with you. (Be patient) Mock not. May the light come to you.
The truth within me tell me we do NOT have as many chances as it takes to live the truth. The truth within me tells me that most people do NOT know the truth is within them. The truth within me tells me NOT to be a simple man. The truth within me recognizes and affirms the law of noncontradiction.
Please explain how the truth within me would lead me to contradictory conclusions to yours.
I feel better now.
I must have been possessed by Richard Dawkins.Cast that demon out...lol
Leave a comment
Subscriptions
Reader Comments
- william conover on Psalm 27: A musical commentary
- Johnny O on Ravi Zacharias explains in 'Has Christianity Failed You?'
- E. I. Sanchez on That The World May Know DVD Series now in Netflix
- E. I. Sanchez on Ravi Zacharias explains in 'Has Christianity Failed You?'
- Johnny O on Ravi Zacharias explains in 'Has Christianity Failed You?'
- Johnny O on The Cordoba House (aka Ground Zero Mosque)
- Dan on Do Atheists Believe in Predestination?
- Monica on That The World May Know DVD Series now in Netflix
- Thomas.thibeault on T E Deckard
- Thomas.thibeault on T E Deckard





